Two Methods to Quantify Defects in Construction

Are you familiar with the term construction defects? Well, people are aware of disruptions and delays in a construction project but often fail to comprehend and identify the construction defects. Defects in construction projects are common yet crucial areas that can cause danger to the life of the people involved in construction and the ones who have to reside in the building.

However, construction defects are not caused by a single cause and there are often multiple factors that add to the magnanimity of the defect. Owing to this fact, the building owners and other stakeholders instantly opt for quantum experts to quantify the construction defects in terms of the frequency and magnitude.

The article also aims to detail its readers about the professional ways in which one can safely quantify the defective construction project.

Two methods for quantification of construction defects

There is still a lack of research on the quantification methods of construction defects. However, through expert knowledge and technical analysis, this article comes up with two of the most effective methods of identification and quantification of defects.

Here are the following two methods that are famous in dealing with loopholes in the construction process.

  1. Fault-tree construction

The method was first introduced by Bell laboratories and is widely used for analyzing the reliability, maintainability and safety of a system. The fault-tree method follows a deductive approach and is categorized as a reliable method for defect quantification in a construction process.

The deductive analysis starts from a generic conclusion and then determines the specific causes of defect from the stated conclusion thus constructing a fault-tree logic diagram. In simpler words the approach is also called a top-down strategy.

The analysis method aims to help identify the potential causes of system failure and involves calculations that evaluate the probability of a top event using analytical and statistical methods. The calculations involved not only ensure reliable quantification of construction but also makes sure the maintainability information like failure and repair rate.

  1. Risk importance measures

The risk importance method is another solution of quantification that can be implied to the post construction analysis process. It is another technical procedure that deals with quantification and additional risks and costs involved in a defective construction project.

For example, a building might not have a gas supply connection while having all the gas pipes installed while lacking connection with the gas meter. This construction defect is not only dangerous for the building residents but also requires additional costs required to rebuild the wall again and ensure proper gas connections.

Hence, the issue can be effectively resolved by quantum experts opting for risk importance measures.

Final Takeaway!

After looking in detail about the defect quantification in construction, it is evident that the process is quite complex and may need experts in quantum to deeply and accurately root for a faulty construction process.

The aforementioned methods: fault-tree construction and risk importance measures are the best technical ways to deal with construction defects and its quantification and would certainly require you to look for experts.

Hence, wait no more and get this sorted out as soon as possible to save any potential construction threats in the future.